tv The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell MSNBC April 4, 2019 10:00pm-11:00pm PDT
i want to mention one thing to look for in tomorrow's news early in the day. i just mentioned a moment ago we think there are seven different open law enforcement investigations right now into the trump inaugural. seven different ones. we don't know what all of are now it's time for the last word with lawrence o'donnell. >> good evening.
it's thursday. it's only thursday. i should say. in what has become leak week. so there could, there could be more leaks about the mueller investigation that we're reporting on at this very hour tomorrow night. >> this time last night when you and i were talking what was going on with the "new york times" story, we're finally hearing from people in mueller's investigation for the first time in 22 months. after that, "washington post" had their own version of the story, nbc news had their own version of the story, cnn. that means reporters at all of those news organizations nouz have sources connected to mueller's team willing to talk. >> and those stories are all now interacting with chairman jerry nadler's approach toet going the mueller report. we see this letter where he's quoting these news articles and putting it to the attorney general that this actually increases his rationale for demanding the full report. >> a whole new ball is rolling. >> thank you, rachel.
on a day when donald trump announced that he wants to make herman kaine a member of the federal reserve board, it seems like a good time to ask, what is the worst trump appointment? at the end of this hour, i will show you video of the current front-runner for worst trump appointment. he had to testify to the house committee yesterday where democratic congresswoman kathryn chark asked film if he will committed a crime, she asked him if he committed a crime to help a billionaire friend of donald trump who is also a sex trafficker and a child rapist. you would expect his answer to be of course not, of course i did not commit a crime to help a sex trafficker and child rapist but this is the trump administration we're talking about, so that wasn't his answer. you're going to want to see every minute of congresswoman kathryn clark going in on the person who as of now is the
front-runner for worst donald trump appointee. that will be at the end of this hour. there's also going to be a small tax law class. a little later in this hour. i have more important tax law to read to you to add to our coverage from last night about the house ways and means chairman richard kneel demanding trump's tax returns. if president trump has tried to interfere with that demand, then president trump could already be guilty of a crime that carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison. if president trump picked up the phone and called the irs commissioner and said, don't give them my tax returns, then president trump committed a federal crime. this is an even more obscure law than the not so ob cure law that chairman richard kneel is using to demand the president's tax returns. we will have former commissioner of the irs joining us who knows these laws. but first, the drip, drip, drip of what appear to be leaks from inside the mueller investigation
are now driving congress's demands for the mueller report. today the chairman of the house judiciary committee jerry nadler sent a letter to the attorney general based entirely on those leaks and used him as further reason to demand the full unredacted release of the mueller report to the judiciary committee. there's something very important that appears in every story that has been written about these leaks by the reporters who have obtained these leaks. i'm going to ask one of those reporters about this in a moment. the "new york times," "washington post," and nbc news all attribute the leaks the same way. they do not attribute the leaks directly to members of the mueller investigation team. they all attribute leaks to people who have spokenton members of the mueller team in some reports, they are identified as associates of the mueller team. here's what nbc news reporting added to what has now become the leaks beat. they added this today. according to a senior law enforcement official who has
spoken to members of mueller's team, mueller team members say the mueller report includes detailed accounts of trump campaign contacts with russian while mueller found no coordination or criminal conspiracy the official said, some on the special counsel's team say his findings paint a picture of a campaign whose members were manipulated by a sophisticated russian intelligence operation and so when the full mueller report comes out, will the trump defense be no collusion, just manipulation? russian manipulation of the trump campaign. house judiciary chairman jerry nadler his letter to the attorney general today begins this way. i write to you regarding troubling press reports relating to your handling of special counsel mueller's report and to your knowledge that you immediately release to the public nel summaries contained in the report that may have been prepared by the special counsel, "the new york times" and the "washington post" both report that some in the special counsel's office have raised concerns about your letter
summarizing the results of the special counsel's investigation. these reports suggest that the special counsel prepared his own summaries intended for public consumption which you chose to withhold in favor your own. in fact, one unnamed u.s. official is quoted as saying that mueller's team assumed the information was going to be made available to the public and so they prepared their summaries to be shared in their own words and not in the attorney general's summary of their work as turned out to be the case. the news stories provoked nadler to make a new request of the attorney general "we also request that you produce to the committee all communications between the special counsel's office and the department regarding the report including those regarding the disclosure of the report to congress, the disclosure of the report to the public and those regarding your march 24th letter that purports to summarize the principal conclusions reaped by the special counsel and the results of his investigation."
so that's jerry nadler saying he now wants to see every memo, every e email@example.com and text between the special counsel's office and the attorney general's office about the release of the mueller report. nadler took note of a justice department statement earlier today about the release of the report. at the close of his letter he said the department's press statement today noted that you do not believe the report should be released in serial or piecemeal fashion. unfortunately, that selective release has in effect already occurred even though the attorney general himself has now written two public letters in which he described the mueller report. he today said he doesn't believe the report should be released in piecemeal fashion. jerry nadler was factually correct to point out the attorney general has already done that himself, already releasing tiny pieces of the report. none of them even complete sentences. house speaker nancy pelosi has had it with the piecemeal release of information about the
mueller report. >> release the mueller report as soon as possible. and let me just say, the mueller report will be released. it's just a question of to us it is inevitable. to them, it is inconceivable. shorten the distance between the inevitable and inconceivable. show us the reported. i think they should release the report. that's where the evidence is. the information is. let's see the report. if they don't have anything to hide, they shouldn't worry. >> simple as that. we have exactly who we need to sort all of this out. joining our discussion now to consider the week of leaks, the possible legal struggle between the attorney general and special prosecutor and the politics of it all, ken dilanian is one of the reporters who broke the nbc news story today reporting on the mueller team's reaction to the attorney general's handling of the mueller report. ken is an intelligence and national security reporter for nbc news. former federal prosecutor kristin peters hamlin is joining
us, she was assistant u.s. attorney when robert mueller was the u.s. attorney. and her boss. she obviously knows the muellerer methods. and for a look at the mueller report's complicated place in our politics now, there's no one better to analyze that for us than john heilemann, a national affairs analyst for nbc news and msnbc, co-host and executive producer of "the circus." ken, let me start with you and your reporting. i'm noticing that you don't see in any of these reports anyone quoting directly and including your reporting a member of the mueller team. it seems to be people who have spoken with members of the mueller team. is that an accurate representation of the sourcing? ing. > it is, lawrence. i'll be honest with you, it's not the kind of reporting i normally like to do. quoting anonymous sources speaking to anonymous other people. relating to second hand information, but in this case, the demand for the information
is such and the investigation is sensitive enough, that we were all willing to accept information from trusted sources, people we've been dealing with a long time we know are talking to members of the mueller team. these are people, these members of the mueller team, many of them work for the justice department. they're putting their careers at risk by discussing out of school information about a sensitive investigation and speaking off the reservation as it were. but are frustrated and want this information out. they're talking to friends, talking to associates. they know -- it's not a plant. i mean, they're not doing it with the purpose of it to be basses on to media. i think they know by talking that some of this stuff is going to find its way to the press and it has. the biggest frustration that i heard was the fact that barr took it upon himself to clear the president on obstruction. it's been a question since the moment he did that. was that coordinated with the mueller team? did they know that was going to happen. at least some faction of the mueller team believes that was completely inappropriate.
they wanted to throw that will question to congress. they presented evidence on both sides of the obstruction question. it is true mueller did not reach a legal conclusion whether there was a prosecutable case. the idea wasn't that barr would pronounce the president clean on obstruction. then there are objections to the language he used in his letter where he said there was no criminal intent. rod rosenstein found it did not meet the burden of prosecution. the mueller team or some members of the mueller team think there was evidence that president trump obstructed justice. there wasn't enough that mueller made the call. we still don't know the reason for that. full disclosure, lawrence. we don't know how many members of the mueller team feel this way and don't know whether bob mueller himself feels this way and whether he knew that barr was going to do this. we felt it was important enough to pass along to viewers that these concerns exist. >> kristin, you're a former colleague of bob mueller. you're familiar with his
methods. is what we're learning as we sits here which is very different what we knew on monday night about all this what you would expect from mueller this notion that his report contains some summary material that was instantly ready to be released to the public because he knew there would be a demand, there might be a need for something to be released instantly? are these reports you're hearing from inside the mueller investigation, do they make sense to you in terms of what you know about the mueller method? >> mueller is a man of impeccable integrity and he's incredibly skilled. i believe that what is really going on here is that bob mueller understands that in the rare sort of circumstance where you have the president of the united states, that the prosecutor in those kinds of cases are, is, congress. so he will laid out all the evidence and he decided that in
this instance, it should be the united states congress that makes the decision and that's what leon jaworski did, as well. that would have been an appropriate thing to do. he's a very by the book person and he's not at all afraid to make a decision. he's a decisive person once he's gotten all of the evidence and the facts. i think what we have here is a pass that was thrown to congress by the mueller team with adequate evidence for congress to make the decision on obstruction. and there was an interception by bill barr and he ran in the exact opposite direction. i couldn't agree more with the problems on the obstruction analysis. there are serious analytical problems with the summary with respect to the findings that he suggested regarding obstruction. he has very serious analytical problems and also process problems with somebody like rod rosenstein who said he should be not involved in this.
we need a special prosecutor because he was sort of an accessory after the fact if it was a crime. it's problematic to have him involved along with barr who basically telegraphed he thinks there's no such thing as presidential obstruction when he lobbied for the positionings. >> chuck grassley tweeted today i support release of the mueller report. he could have easily not put that tweet out today. he used to be the chairman of the senate judiciary committee which would have had direct jurisdiction. he would have been receiving these letters from barr. he's an important voice among republicans on this kind of issue. >> yes, look, there are a couple places where angels appear to tread. one is arguing with you about congress. another is argue with ken about his reporting. i will say this what my sense of this is on the basis of some reporting of my own. i think ken is just a little bit off in his assessment of the motivations of the mueller team.
i don't think they were thinking that that they told people about this it might get in the press. they wanted this in the press. this is a group of people buttoned up. >> you're saying this is a deliberate indirectly. they've said it to people who they will know will say it. >> probably have different direct ben disks to people and said if you're called by a reporter, i'm happy to have you talk about it. they were so buttoned up during the investigation, nothing leaked, no one spoke. to deviate from that is such an -- it's a left turn for them. speaks to outrage as what they see having been done by the attorney general. they feel the emotion that they wrote executive summaries intending to get around all of the problems of at least in the first instance to get around all the problems of things that couldn't come out because of
grand jury testimony or that couldn't come out because of classification they wanted to speak to the public and put their stamp on it and denied that possibility. these people who dedicated their lives to this are incredibly bissed off is the right word. it's feeding into this political situation that grassley is part of. bill barr was in a very tenuous situation politically when he got this job. the tide has turned against him. you see that on the democratic side 100%. no benefit of the doubt for him anymore. republicans are starting to feel the same way. >> ken ken, i want to get your reaction about the sourcing. i think we're going to have more, my sense is we'll have more of these stories. you might have more of these stories tomorrow or the days to come. but kristin, i want to come back to you for a moment. you're nodding when john was talking about the frustrations of the mueller team. talk about the difference of their situation from when they were actually on the job working on this report to the point where they're now a couple of weeks out of the job. how does that change things for them? why does that make them more
willing to talk to their associates who then talked to ken dilanian? >> i don't think that the reason that they're talking now is because now they're out of the position. i think the reason they're talking now is the precise reason he just identified. this is a buttoned up operation. bob mueller is a buttoned up guy. and the team was buttoned up, as well. and now they're whistleblowers. >> yeah. >> that's what the issue is. i mean, their outrage. i've got to tell you the people that appear to be to me to be the most outraged by what's going on are all the former federal prosecutors with whom i speak because we understand the norms and the guardrails are off. i mean, this is not the department of justice that i recognize. this is not a presidency that i recognize. and i'm a bit of a presidential history buff. i've never seen anything like this. i can't even imagine this is my country. >> let me give ken the last word in this segment on the dynamics
of these leaks. why they've been happening and what your projection is on what you think, what more you think you might be getting on these kinds of leaks before the >> i don't think you can dismiss what john is saying. i think part of it is these people have left the mueller orbit, that tight circle and gone back to their other jobs and more free to talk at least to associates. regardless of that, the frustration is that william barr set a narrative with a cursory brief document that essentially absolved the president legally of crimes. but the people who did this investigation for two years know there's a lot more than that, both on the obstruction issue and on the collusion issue. as you said, there's a whole narrative about russian contacts and the question whether the trump campaign was manipulated was an unwitting dupe over russian intelligence operation. we'll see more information about that. a lot depends how quickly william barr can get this report out. we're getting signals from the
justice department the intent is to do that. he's going to be grilled about this. >> let me get a last word from john. john, it seems and seemed to me at the time that donald trump had his very best day with the mueller report on the monday coverage after that sunday night letter from the attorney general where the headlines treated as if the mueller report had been released. they didn't say the barr better, they said the mueller report. everything since then has not been positive for the president. >> barr made a gamble in addition to do this thing that outraged a lot of people and people who thought bill barr, their hope was that barr would be the institutionalist even though he wrote a memo begging for the job, even though he put forward his views on obstruction of justice. he made a public releases gamble. it was like i'm going to put the most positive spin on this. we'll let first impressions sink in and when we get to the bad stuff, because he must know
mueller will testify that heal have to testify, that by then, first impressions will be set. but that is a dangerous gamble because firsts in there culture, first impressions don't hold. first impressions go away. what happens is the relentless pounding of negative stories that come out later could easily supplant the positive impression from that monday. this could make the situation worse for trump rather than better. >> john, kristin, and ken, thank you all. ken, i'm going to be here tomorrow night. bring your leaks a little bit earlier. >> i'll give it my best shot. >> can i get them sooner? i'll be here in your here. >> you'll can be first to know. >> thank you. when we come back, former irs commissioner john koskinen will join us about chairman richie kneel's demand for the trump tax returns and the possibility that president trump has already committed a crime in
trying to block the irs from handing over those tax returns. and at the end of the hour, we will take a look at the front-runner, the man who is now the front-runner for worst trump nominee. he's the one who helped a billionaire friend of donald trump avoid prison time for sex trafficking and child rape. you will want to see the video of him being questioned about that in the house of representatives. ♪ limu emu & doug what do all these people have in common, limu? [ paper rustling ] exactly, nothing. they're completely different people, that's why they need customized car insurance from liberty mutual. they'll only pay for what they need! [ gargling ] [ coins hitting the desk ] yes, and they could save a ton. you've done it again, limu. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪
oh, wow. you two are going to have such a great trip. thanks to you, we will. this is why voya helps reach today's goals... ...all while helping you to and through retirement. can you help with these? we're more of the plan, invest and protect kind of help... voya. helping you to and through retirement.
after house ways and means committee chairman richard kneel used his absolute legal power to demand that the irs commissioner give him six years of trump's perm and business tax returns, "the washington post" is reporting privately trump has told white house advisers that he does not plan to hand over his tax returns to congress and that he would fight the issue to the supreme court hoping to stall it till after the 2020 election according to two administration officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the conversation. treasury officials will not comply with the request until they are compelled to do so the officials said. donald trump has absolutely no legal right to the stop the irs commissioner from handing over those tax returns to the chairman of the house ways and means complete. it is a crime for donald trump specifically to tell the irs commissioner not to hand over his tax returns which brings us to an even more obscure law than the law chairman kneel used to demand the tax returns.
internal revenue service code title 26 section 72-17 prohibition on executive branch influence over taxpayer audits and other investigations. that phrase other investigations applies to the investigation that chairman richard kneel is conducting. this law uses the phrase applicable person because it's a law that does not apply to you and me. it doesn't apply to everyone. who is an applicable person in for pumps of this section the term applicable person means the president. the vice president,ness employee of the executive office of the president and any employee of the executive office of the vice president. and here is what the law says about an applicable person meaning the president. it shall be unlawful for any applicable person to quarterback directly or indirectly any officer or are employee of the of internal revenue service to
conduct or terminate an audit or other investigation of any particular taxpayer with respect to the tax liability of such taxpayer. having written sections of the tax code when i was on the staff of the senate finance committee, let me translate that for you. it says it's a crime for the president to request that the irs commissioner or anyone else at the irs not cooperate with chairman richard neal's investigation. and the law doesn't stop there. if the president has made that phone call, if the president has called up the commissioner of the irs any time in the last few months when they knew this was coming and said, don't give them my tax returns, the irs commissioner is under legal obligation to immediately report that phone call to their treasury's inspector general and if the commissioner doesn't do that, then the commissioner has himself committed a crime by not reporting the trump request. the penalty in this law for the
president or anyone in the trump white house calling up the irs commissioner and telling him not to hand over the tax returns is a maximum of five years in prison. the penalty for the irs commissioner himself not reporting that someone made that request is the same thing. maximum of five years in prison. so knowing the impulse of donald trump as we do, what is the likelihood he has committed that federal crime already? and knowing the incompetence and legal il literacy of trump appointees what is the likelihood his commissioner has committed the crime of not reporting the president's possible crime in the answer to both questions is we don't know. we know both things are possible because this is the trump administration as we know there is nothing donald trump wants to keep secret more than his tax returns. he saw this coming. his irs commissioner saw this coming and known for months chairman neal was going to do this. did donald trump at any point say to anyone in the irs or tell
anyone working in the trump white house to tell the irs to never hand over the trump tax returns? the law allows one specific person in the executive branch to communicate with the irs about this. and that person is the attorney general. the law also allows people not working in the executive branch like, for example, president trump's personal attorneys to communicate with the irs about this. and so the president seemed very well rehearsed today when he was asked about this. >> commissioner of the irs not to disclose to the house ways and means committee your tax returns. >> they'll speak to the attorney general. >> are you directing the irs not to do that. >> they'll speak to my lawyers and speak to the attorney general. >> my interview with former irs commissionerer john koskinen is next.
at's what 24/7 means, suga. kind of like how you get 24/7 access to licensed agents with geico. hmm? yeah, you just go online, or give them a call anytime. you don't say. yep. now what will it take to get 24/7 access to that lemon meringue pie? pie! pie's coming! that's what it takes, baby. geico®. great service from licensed agents, 24/7. if your moderate to severeor crohn's symptoms are holding you back, and your current treatment hasn't worked well enough it may be time for a change. ask your doctor about entyvio®, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio® works at the site of inflammation in the gi tract, and is clinically proven to help many patients achieve both symptom relief and remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen
during or after treatment. entyvio® may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. pml, a rare, serious, potentially fatal brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. tell your doctor if you have an infection experience frequent infections or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio®. if your uc or crohn's treatment isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio®. entyvio®. relief and remission within reach.
- ( phone ringing )es offers - big button,lized phones... and volume-enhanced phones. get details on this state program. visit right now or call during business hours. and accessoriesphones for your mobile phone. like this device to increase volume on your cell phone. - ( phone ringing ) - get details on this state program visit right now or call during business hours.
there are a series of other options going forward we will explore. we've already begun to think about them. >> are you considering subpoenas? >> that's something we would have to consider down the road. >> that is the man of few public words. the chairman of the house ways and means committee richard neal who issued his demand for the trump tax returns. our next guest is someone who can give us insight into the real workings of the internal revenue service. john koskinen served as commissioner from 2013 to 2017 in the obama administration. thank you for joining us tonight. it's a real honor to speak to you about this. i want to get your reading of
section 6103 of the tax code which gives the chairman of the ways and means committee, chairman of the senate fans committee the right to demand not request, demand tax returns of any individual from the irs commissioner. do you see it applying in the way the chairman neal has used it. >> well, the committee has moved thoughtfully and carefully trying to insure in this situation we don't set a precedent that comes back to haunt everyone which would be to allow a chairman of committees and the congress start requesting anyone's tax returns for any purpose whether it's harassment or intimidation. it is important while the statute is clear, it says shall, to insure that it's done in a way that to the extent it's precedential and it will be going forward, taxpayers are protected from having their information produced for something beyond the legitimate operations of the congress.
as i say, the committee has worked to have an overall tax oversight description of what they need the returns for and we'll see how people respond to that. >> when the republicans were in control of these committees you received some demands under section 6103. didn't you? >> i never received them personally. before i got there there was the issue of whether the irs was targeting conservative groups. so some of the tax returns or applications from those groups were requested and produced to the oversight -- or the ways abmeans committee for review to see what the irs operations were. none of those operations wroez to this kind of investigation. >> are you aware of any indications where the irs commissioner, any of your predecessors did not comply with
the demand from the chairman of finance or the chairman of ways and means like this. >> i'm not aware of any situation that had this kind of a controversy associated wutg it. and i would say first i should remind everybody, i don't know anything about the president's taxes. and if i did, i wouldn't be able to talk about it. this is a general discussion. but the statute does say the secretary shall. so the statute seems to contemplate that the secretary of the treasury will make this decision, not the irs commissioner. will there are a lot of cases where it says the secretary it means the commissioner. this is ultimately a decision for the treasury secretary. >> i want to mention that other law that i was talking about is just a post watergate law where they are actually trying to protect the irs from presidents like nixon who used to pick up the phone and tell the irs who he wanted audited this week. they've really created a roadblock of any of that kind of communication between the president and the irs commissioner.
how much communication did you have with president obama directly whether he you were commissioner? >> i met with him once shortly after i was confirmed in which he thanked me for taking on what appeared to be at the time a thankless job and never heard from anyone in the white house, never talked to the president after that. actually i never talked to president trump after his inauguration. and never actually had anyone from the white house ever i was served for a year in the trump administration and no one from the white house ever called about any issue with regard to tax administration. i always try to make it clear that the irs does tax administration independently without outside influence. tax policy, tax legislation other issues are not the domain of the irs. they are the domain of the treasury secretary and the political arms of the administration. >> former irs commissioner john koskinen, thank you for joining us. really appreciate it. >> my pleasure. >> when we come back, president
trump has not gotten a bump in the polls after william barr's summary of the mueller report. it seems nothing can turn things favorably for the president in the polls. jason johnson will join us next. (nat♪re sounds) corey is living with metastatic breast cancer, which is breast cancer that has spread to other parts of her body.
she's also taking prescription ibrance with an aromatase inhibitor, which is for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive her2- metastatic breast cancer as the first hormonal based therapy. ibrance plus letrozole was significantly more effective at delaying disease progression versus letrozole. patients taking ibrance can develop low white blood cell counts, which may cause serious infections that can lead to death. before taking ibrance, tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection, liver or kidney problems, are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant. common side effects include low red blood cell and low platelet counts, infections, tiredness, nausea, sore mouth, abnormalities in liver blood tests, diarrhea, hair thinning or loss, vomiting, rash, and loss of appetite. corey calls it her new normal because a lot has changed, but a lot hasn't. ask your doctor about ibrance. the #1 prescribed fda-approved oral combination treatment for hr+/her2- mbc.
even if they tiny fraction of the public believed that, donald trump's poll numbers would have gone up. they are unchanged. he's lock inside at a 43% approval rating and there is no good news that donald trump can look forward to to try to change those poll numbers. joining us now for the politics of where the president now stands, jason johnson, the politics editor at the root.com, an msnbc cricketer. you have this active democratic presidential field and there's not much focus on the republican campaign for the presidency because it is of course, president trump. i've never seen a candidate more locked in cement in polling. > yeah, there's absolutely nothing he can do to change anyone's opinion of him at this point. if you're a republican you're enthused because he won with 47% last time. all i need is a 4% bump. the economy is still going good. the other problem if there is no flexibility, he is not running against hillary clinton next year. he's running against objectively
the most qualified field of presidential candidates in about 35 years. if you look at the experience, if you look at the money raised, if you look at the number of constituents they represent. if he has no flexibility in his numbers he can't win. he's not running against hillary. he's not running against a hated person. these numbers are not good when the largest controversy of your president ending doesn't help. >> you he's done something nothing other first term president has ever done. he hasn't spent one second trying to appeal to a voter who didn't already vote for him. >> he's delusional. that's part of it. he's being lied to by kellyanne conway who tell him he's doing better than he is. this is an administration and a republican party that knows that their success next year is in voter suppression. they will not be able to change minds and won't be able to bring people out. voter suppression only works if there is no enthusiasm on the other side. if democrats pick someone they're excited about, that will overcome voting issues.
>> jason, thank you for joining us tonight. when we come back, president trump wants herman kaine to be a member of the federal reserve. even that might not turn out to be his worst appointment. that's next. ♪ born to be wild (avo) moves like these need pampers cruisers 360 fit. with an ultra stretchy waistband and 360 fit that adapts to every wild move. plus, up to 12 hours of protection. so anything your wild child does, cruisers can too. our best ever fit is new cruisers 360 fit. ♪ ♪
but i'm more than a number. when i'm not teaching, i'm taking steep grades and tight corners. my essilor lenses offer more than vision correction with three innovative technologies for my ultimate in vision clarity and protection together in a single lens: the essilor ultimate lens package. so, i can do more of what i love! buy two pairs of essilor's best lenses and get a $100 back instantly. see more. do more. essilor (alarm beeping) welcome to our busy world. where we all want more energy. but with less carbon footprint. that's why, at bp, we're working to make energy that's cleaner and better. we're producing cleaner-burning natural gas. and solar and wind power. and wherever your day takes you... we have advanced fuels for a better commute. and we're developing ultra-fast-charging technology for evs.. at bp, we see possibilities everywhere. so we can all keep advancing.
you wouldn't accept an incomplete job from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? most pills don't finish the job because they don't relieve nasal congestion. flonase sensimist is different. it relieves all your worst symptoms, including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. it's more complete allergy relief. and all from a gentle mist you can barely feel. flonase sensimist helps block six key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. and six is greater than one. flonase sensimist.
and six is greater than one. all of you. how you live, what you love. that's what inspired us to create america's most advanced internet. internet that puts you in charge. that protects what's important. it handles everything, and reaches everywhere. this is beyond wifi, this is xfi. simple. easy. awesome. xfinity, the future of awesome. when they ask me who is is the brez of u becky stan stan, i'm going to say i don't know. do you know. >> i don't know. he's back. donald trump wants to add herman
cain to his list of worst presidential appoint ps in history. today the president said he's going to nomts him to be a member of the federal reserve. we already know that herman cain thinks interest rates should be. >> 999. >> 999. >> 999. >> herman cain dropped out of the 2012 presidential primary campaign after a brief surge at the top of the republican primary polls when he was credibly accused of having had a long-term extraction marital affair and accused of sexual harassment. those were the days when most republican voters cared. the only reason to nominate him to the federal reserve board now is to make the current trump nominee to the federal reserve look better. the president has already nominated steven moore who is on his way to a lot of trouble if he ever makes it to his not yet scheduled senate confirmation hearing because he is not an economist. he has only a master's degree in economics and you don't really qualify as a member of the profession without a p.h.d. in economics.
now that his nomination provoked a closer look at moore's background, we know that court records show he is a deadbeat dad who failed to pay child support for several months and a tax cheat who when he did pay child support deducted it on his tax return which is completely illegal. child support is not tax deductible. everyone who pays child support knows that. but her main cane and steven moore are not donald trump's worst choice for a presidential appointment. his worst choice is the guy who let a billionaire sex trafficker and child rapist get off the hook with no prison time. the man hop did that is now a trump cabinet member and he was asked in a hearing of the house of representatives yesterday if he broke the law to help the billionaire sex trafficker and child rapist. we'll show you that video next. video next next
limu's right. liberty mutual can save you money by customizing your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. oh... yeah, i've been a customer for years. huh... only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ now kayak and opentable let you earn travel rewards every time you dine. earn points with each restaurant reservation on opentable and redeem them for hotel discounts on kayak. get started at kayak.com/diningrewards.
what do you look for i want free access to research. yep, td ameritrade's got that. free access to every platform. yeah, that too. i don't want any trade minimums. yeah, i totally agree, they don't have any of those. i want to know what i'm paying upfront. yes, absolutely. do you just say yes to everything? hm. well i say no to kale. mm. yeah, they say if you blanch it it's better, but that seems like a lot of work. no hidden fees. no platform fees. no trade minimums. and yes, it's all at one low price. td ameritrade. ♪
the trump secretary of labor alex acosta is now a front-runner for worst person appointed by president trump. he was called to the house of representatives yesterday to testify on the president's budget proposal for the labor department and we knew he was going to be asked about his days as a federal prosecutor in florida when he made a deal with president trump's billionaire friend jeffrey epstein facing charges of possible sex trafficking and child rape.
knowing that that was going to happen, you'd think that alex acosta would have been a little more careful about the labor department's budget for stopping child labor and human trafficking. >> the international labor affairs bureau, ilab, within the department of labor is responsible for combatting exploitive child labor, forced labor and human trafficking, is that correct? >> that is correct. >> so, the smart move for alex acosta would have been to increase the labor department's spending on the ilab piece of their budget. it's a relatively small item in the labor department budget, so a small increase in a small item in the budget would help the labor secretary with that little problem of his. that when he was a prosecutor he made a deal that allowed a billionaire sex trafficker and child rapist to avoid prison. that would be a smart move, but this is the trump labor secretary we're talking about.
>> you've also proposed a budget cut of almost 80%, 79% to ilab, where this work is done, bringing its budget from 68 million to just 18.5 million. >> congresswoman katherine clark of massachusetts was just getting warmed up. what you're about to see could only happen in the trump administration because only donald trump would appoint someone like alex acosta to his cabinet and only the trump-controlled republican senate would vote to confirm someone who now stands accused by a federal judge of breaking the law, breaking the law as a prosecutor to help a billionaire sex trafficker and child rapist. >> when you were the u.s. attorney for the southern district of florida, your office investigated jeffrey epstein and found -- your office found that
there had been a sexual abuse pyramid scheme that involved at least 36 underage girls, ranging in age from 14 to 17. this is horrifying and sick stuff. mr. epstein raped and assaulted these girls. he recruited them out of shopping malls. he had employees that helped with this. and then he invited his friends to do the same. and there is evidence that he transported these girls among his mansions throughout the united states and abroad. epstein and his friends destroyed these girls' lives. senator ben sasse called mr. epstein a monster. would you say that's a fair characterization? >> he engaged in vile crimes, yes. >> you're a law professor, besides many of your other jobs that you've had, and i'm sure you know there is no such thing
as child prostitution under federal law, only child sex trafficking, and each offense under 18 usc 1591 carries a sentence ranging from ten years to life in prison. so logically mr. epstein with the investigation of the federal u.s. attorney's office should have been looking at a potential sentence of 360 years, at a minimum, but that's not what happened because there was a power dynamic here, wasn't there? we had teenage girls with no power who were rape and sexual assault victims and we had mr. epstein and his friends, extremely powerful, wealthy and connected people. in a ruling on february 21st of 2019, judge maher found you illegally entered a non-prosecution agreement that allows mr. epstein to serve just 13 months in county jail where
he received 12 hours a day on work release six days out of the week. the judge found you broke the law, secretary acosta, when you chose not to tell the victims about this deal. and that you gave them the impression that this investigation was ongoing. and do you disagree with any of the facts that were found in the opinion that judge maher issued? >> congresswoman, first, let me -- let me say that the southern district of florida has prosecuted sex trafficking aggressively in the past and it is an incredibly important issue and it's something that needs to be aggressively pursued. turning to the -- turning -- >> do you disagree -- i get to ask the questions here. do you disagree with any of the
facts as presented in the opinion of judge mara? >> the department of justice, i think rightly so for the past 12 years, has defended the action -- >> that is a yes or no question. i ask unanimous consent to submit the opinion. >> and alex acosta did not disagree with one word of the judge's opinion that congresswoman clark was referring to. the judge said that alex acosta broke the law. alex acosta had a chance to say, no, i did not break the law, but he didn't say that, but at least he did say that what jeffrey epstein did were, quote, vile crimes. that's not the way donald trump saw his friend, billionaire jeffrey epstein. he thinks jeffrey epstein's a terrific guy. and donald trump seems to have had some idea of what jeffrey epstein was up to. he joked about it.
here's what donald trump said about his friend jeffrey epstein in 2002. donald trump said, "i've known jeff for 15 years. terrific guy. he's a lot of fun to be with. it is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as i do, and many of them are on the younger side. no doubt about it, jeffrey enjoys his social life." on the younger side. terrific guy. not a monster. donald trump doesn't think jeffrey epstein is a monster. donald trump still hasn't said that what jeffrey epstein did were vile crimes. in fact, after everything that has been publicly revealed about jeffrey epstein in court, donald trump still hasn't said anything negative about his friend. we couldn't find a negative word that donald trump has said about jeffrey epstein, right up to
this date, and so no matter how bad the trump appointees get, no matter how far down in the barrel donald trump reaches for t the worst person in the trump administration is always going to be donald trump. that's tonight's last word. "the 11th hour" with brian williams starts now. >> tonight, pressure mounting on attorney general william barr to release the mueller report. the doj on defense, amidst leaks from the special counsel's office, is there more to what mueller found about obstruction than barr let on? the president does an about face on his border shutdown threat while battling pressure from democrats to release his tax returns next week, and joe biden to